BLOG
A collection of article and ideas that help Smart Marketers to become Smarter
Marketing Canvas Master Class Introduction
Please find below the slide ware I use when starting my Marketing Master Class.
Download the pdf here
Marketing Canvas - Budget
Budget is the 24th Marketing Canvas dimension — scoring not how much you spend, but how deliberately. Learn the four properties, the 3-Cycle allocation logic, and the 90/10 innovation reserve principle.
About the Marketing Canvas Method
This article covers dimension 640 — Budget, part of the
Metrics meta-category. The Marketing Canvas Method structures
marketing strategy across 24 dimensions and 9 strategic archetypes.
Full framework reference at
marketingcanvas.net →
·
Get the book →
In a nutshell
Budget is the 24th and final dimension of the Marketing Canvas — and the one that governs all the others. It scores not how much you spend on marketing, but how deliberately you spend it. The dimension measures four properties: allocation logic (is the budget based on strategic priorities, not inertia?), planning integration (is it a component of the overall business plan with a defined timeframe?), monitoring discipline (do you reallocate when something is not working?), and innovation reserve (do you protect a portion — typically 10% — for experimental approaches?).
The canonical framing: a company that allocates 100% of its marketing budget to proven tactics will never discover the channel, message, or format that produces breakthrough results. A company that cannot defend its budget allocation against its own strategic priorities has substituted familiarity for strategy.
Introduction
Every initiative identified across the 23 preceding dimensions — every fix, every accelerator, every growth driver — competes for the same finite resource: the marketing budget. Budget is the dimension that determines which of those initiatives actually happen, in what sequence, and at what scale.
This is why the Marketing Canvas positions Budget as a discipline question, not a quantum question. The amount of budget available is a constraint. How that budget is allocated — against which priorities, in which cycle, with what monitoring — is the strategic choice. Two companies with identical budgets can produce radically different outcomes depending on whether their allocation logic follows strategic evidence or historical habit.
The most expensive budget decision a marketing team makes is the one it doesn't consciously make: replicating last year's allocation because changing it requires a conversation no one wants to have.
What the Marketing Canvas scores in Budget
The dimension scores four properties — allocation logic, planning integration, monitoring discipline, and innovation reserve — each addressing a distinct layer of resource discipline.
Allocation logic — is the budget allocated based on multiple factors (industry benchmarks, business capacity, strategic goals, and urgency) rather than inertia? The canonical failure mode is the "same as last year" allocation: the prior year's budget is reproduced with a percentage adjustment, with no systematic re-examination of whether the distribution still reflects the strategic priorities. Allocation logic scores whether the budget follows the strategy or whether the strategy is reverse-engineered to justify the budget. A company in Cycle 1 of the Strategic Action Engine (fixing Fatal Brakes) should have a materially different allocation from the same company in Cycle 3 (scaling growth drivers). If the allocation doesn't shift as the strategy evolves, the budget is not serving the strategy — it is constraining it. Industry benchmarks provide the calibration reference: typically 6–12% of revenue for established businesses, up to 20% for growth-stage companies. The benchmark is not a target; it is a diagnostic.
Planning integration — is the marketing budget a component of the overall business plan, with defined costs linked to specific goals within a defined timeframe? Budget that exists as a standalone line item, detached from the strategic plan it is supposed to fund, produces the most common budget dysfunction: money is available, but there is no explicit connection between what is being bought and what outcome is expected. The chain of accountability the method scores runs from budget item to initiative (Step 4) to dimension score (Step 3) to strategic goal (Step 2). If any link is missing, the budget is partially floating.
Monitoring discipline — do you constantly monitor marketing performance and reallocate spending from underperforming initiatives to those that are working? The test is not whether performance is tracked — most marketing teams track something. The test is whether tracking produces reallocation. A team that reviews campaign performance monthly and continues funding underperforming initiatives for the remainder of the budget cycle because "it's already in the plan" does not have monitoring discipline; it has reporting. Monitoring without reallocation authority is observation without consequence.
Innovation reserve — do you protect a portion of the budget, typically 10%, for exploring new approaches, testing new channels, and discovering what the existing allocation misses? The 90/10 principle is the canonical structure: 90% on proven activities that are already demonstrably working; 10% on experimental approaches where the outcome is uncertain. The 10% is not a luxury allocation for when the primary budget is performing well — it is insurance against strategic rigidity. A company that allocates 100% to proven tactics has committed its entire resource base to yesterday's understanding of what works. The failure mode runs in both directions: below 5% for innovation protects the status quo at the cost of adaptability; above 25% starves the proven activities that generate current returns.
Budget and the 3-Cycle Roadmap
The most strategically significant connection in the Budget dimension is its relationship to the 3-Cycle Strategic Roadmap (Step 5). The canonical cycle allocations determine how the budget should be distributed across the three action streams — FIX, ALIGN, and SCALE — at each phase of strategy execution:
Cycle 1 — Foundation: 80% FIX (Fatal Brakes) / 10% ALIGN (Accelerators) / 10% SCALE (Growth Drivers)
The dominant allocation is repair. Fatal Brakes cannot be papered over with growth investment. A brand with a broken positioning (220) cannot be fixed by doubling the media budget (530). A product with weak features (310) cannot be rescued by an influencer campaign (540). In Cycle 1, the budget's primary function is to fund the foundational work that makes everything else possible. The 10% in ALIGN and SCALE is not wasted — it maintains momentum and tests the growth thesis — but it is not the primary investment.
Cycle 2 — Build: 20% FIX (maintenance) / 60% ALIGN / 20% SCALE
The Fatal Brakes have been addressed. The budget shifts to funding the accelerators — the dimensions that drive the archetype's primary mission. Brand positioning is being sharpened. The value proposition is being refined. The customer experience is being systematically improved. The FIX allocation drops to maintenance level because the structural problems have been resolved, not because they no longer need monitoring.
Cycle 3 — Scale: 10% FIX (maintenance) / 30% ALIGN / 60% SCALE
The budget now funds growth at scale. The Growth Drivers identified in the Vital Audit receive the majority of the investment. The risk in Cycle 3 is premature allocation: companies that skip Cycle 1 and move directly to Cycle 3 investment discover that growth spend on a broken foundation produces volume without compounding returns.
The Budget dimension (641) scores whether the company's actual allocation reflects the cycle it is in — or whether the allocation is driven by what is most visible, most politically comfortable, or most familiar.
Statements for self-assessment
Score each of the four sub-questions from −3 to +3 (no zero), then average for the dimension score. If the average is mathematically zero, round to −1.
Interpreting your scores
Negative scores (−1 to −3): Budget allocation is driven by inertia, prior year habit, or political comfort rather than strategic evidence. Planning integration is absent or superficial — the budget is not connected to specific initiatives with defined outcomes. Monitoring produces reporting but not reallocation. There is no innovation reserve, or it has been absorbed into existing line items. The budget is not serving the strategy; the strategy is being reverse-engineered to justify the budget.
Positive scores (+1 to +3): Allocation logic follows strategic priorities and cycle position. The budget is integrated into the business plan with traceable connections between spend, initiatives, dimensions, and goals. Monitoring has reallocation authority and exercises it. The 10% innovation reserve is protected and generating learning. The budget is an active strategic instrument, not a historical artefact.
Strategic Role
Fatal Brake for A6 (Value Harvester): In a declining market, every euro of marketing spend must demonstrate return. There is no budget slack to absorb misallocation — the market contraction is simultaneously compressing the revenue base from which the budget is drawn and raising the pressure on each remaining customer relationship. A Value Harvester with weak budget discipline is compounding the market problem with a spending problem. Waste is not a nuisance in A6; it is existential. The 641 score — allocation based on strategic evidence rather than inertia — is the most critical sub-question for A6.
Secondary Accelerator for A2 (Efficiency Machine): The Efficiency Machine archetype wins on cost structure and operational discipline. Budget discipline in A2 is not just a financial governance function — it is a strategic signal. A marketing team that cannot maintain budget discipline while the operations team is optimising every cost line sends a structural contradiction to the organisation. A2 companies with strong budget scores reinforce the operational excellence narrative; A2 companies with weak budget scores undermine it from within marketing.
Growth Driver for A2 (Margin Extraction): When the Efficiency Machine deploys the Margin Extraction growth driver, budget discipline is the mechanism. Reducing marketing spend on activities that produce low marginal return — while protecting spend on activities that generate efficient acquisition and retention — directly improves margin without reducing commercial output. The 643 score (monitoring and reallocation discipline) is the specific property that makes Margin Extraction possible: you can only reallocate away from low-return activities if you know which activities are low-return.
In most other archetypes, Budget operates as a constraint discipline rather than a strategic lever — necessary hygiene, but not the dimension that defines the archetype's strategy. The exception is A6, where budget discipline is survival, and A2, where it is a competitive differentiator.
Case study: Green Clean
Green Clean is a fictional eco-friendly residential cleaning service used as the recurring worked example throughout the Marketing Canvas Method.
Score: −2 to −1 (Weak) Green Clean's marketing budget for the current year is €18,000 — approximately 7.2% of revenue, within the benchmark range for a service business at this stage. The allocation was set by the founder in January by reviewing the prior year's spend and making minor adjustments based on what felt underfunded. No benchmark comparison was conducted. No connection was made between the budget allocation and the strategic priorities identified from the dimension scores. The largest line item (€7,200, 40%) is paid social advertising — the same proportion as last year — despite the fact that the acquisition analysis (610) has shown paid social produces the highest CAC and the lowest customer lifetime of any channel. The budget has not been connected to the decision to build the owned media foundation first (530). Monitoring is monthly in theory; in practice, the budget is reviewed when campaigns end. There is no reallocation mechanism — budget is committed to campaigns at the start of the quarter and not adjusted. There is no innovation reserve. The 10% that would fund channel experiments is absorbed into the paid social budget by default.
Score: +1 to +2 (Developing) Green Clean has restructured its budget allocation for the first time using strategic evidence. Following the Vital Audit, the budget has been connected to the three action streams: €10,800 (60%) allocated to Cycle 1 FIX and ALIGN priorities — primarily the owned media content infrastructure, the subscription model architecture, and the Family Health Report development; €5,400 (30%) to proven acquisition and retention activities; €1,800 (10%) protected as an innovation reserve to test two new channel hypotheses (a partnership with a paediatric clinic network and a podcast sponsorship in the indoor health category). The allocation has been formally documented in the business plan with expected outcomes for each stream. Monitoring is now monthly with a defined reallocation trigger: any initiative performing below 70% of its target for two consecutive months is paused and the budget redirected. The innovation reserve has already produced one useful finding: the clinic partnership generated a cost-per-lead 40% below the paid social benchmark. The 10% is earning its place.
Score: +2 to +3 (Strong) Green Clean's budget management operates at the cycle level with quarterly allocation reviews. The company is in Cycle 2 of its Strategic Action Engine: the 20/60/20 split is in effect, with 20% on FIX maintenance (ongoing content production, subscription system upkeep), 60% on ALIGN (deepening the Family Health Report as a differentiation asset, building the referral programme, strengthening the earned media infrastructure), and 20% on SCALE (amplifying the indoor health category narrative through paid media targeted to lookalike audiences of the referral cohort). The 10% innovation reserve — now a protected line that is not subject to reallocation pressure — has cycled through six experiments in 18 months. Three have been discontinued after failing to outperform the control. Two have been graduated into the main budget after demonstrating positive ROI. One is in its second testing cycle. The 641 allocation logic is explicitly benchmarked against Gartner CMO survey data for comparable service businesses annually, with a documented rationale for any deviation. The budget is not a constraint on the strategy — it is an expression of it.
Connected dimensions
Budget connects to every dimension in the Marketing Canvas through resource allocation — every initiative in the 15-slot Strategic Action Engine draws on budget. Four connections are most direct:
610 — Acquisition: Budget funds acquisition. The size and composition of the acquisition budget determines CAC, channel mix, and the rate at which new customers enter the base. A weak 641 allocation that over-invests in high-CAC channels while under-investing in owned media infrastructure is a budget problem expressed as an acquisition problem.
620 — ARPU: Budget funds Stimulation initiatives. The upsell programmes, subscription architecture, and loyalty mechanics that improve purchase frequency and transaction value all require investment. An ARPU strategy without a budget line is a goal without a mechanism.
630 — Lifetime: Budget funds retention. The CRC component of the 634 sub-question is a budget allocation question: how much of the marketing budget is being directed toward keeping customers versus finding new ones? An under-funded retention programme produces the churn consequences that 630 measures.
All 24 dimensions: Budget is the dimension that determines which of the other 23 dimensions receive attention in the current strategic cycle. A dimension that scores −2 in the Vital Audit but receives no budget allocation in the Action Engine plan will still score −2 in the next cycle. The budget is the bridge between the diagnosis and the improvement.
Conclusion
Budget is the dimension that closes the Marketing Canvas cycle. Every insight generated across the other 23 dimensions — every job definition, every positioning choice, every experience design decision, every channel strategy — ultimately requires a budget allocation to move from understanding to action.
The strategic discipline the method requires is not about the size of the budget. It is about the clarity of its connection to strategy. A small budget allocated with precision against the right priorities at the right cycle stage will outperform a large budget allocated by inertia. The 90/10 principle is the practical expression of this: fund what is proven at 90%, fund the discovery of what comes next at 10%, and have the monitoring discipline to know which is which.
The test that closes the review: open the current year's marketing budget. For each line item, identify which dimension score it is designed to improve, which initiative in the Action Engine it funds, and what outcome improvement it is expected to produce. If any line item cannot be traced to a specific strategic purpose — it is funding inertia, not strategy. That is where 641 improvement begins.
Sources
Gartner CMO Spend and Strategy Survey, annual — gartner.com (benchmark reference for marketing spend as % of revenue by industry)
Christine Moorman, The CMO Survey: Highlights and Insights, Deloitte/Duke Fuqua/AMA, annual — cmosurvey.org
Marketing Canvas Method, Appendix E — Dimension 640: Budget, Laurent Bouty, 2026
About this dimension
Dimension 640 — Budget is the final dimension of the Metrics meta-category (600) and the 24th dimension of the Marketing Canvas Method. The Metrics meta-category contains four dimensions: Acquisition (610), ARPU (620), User Lifetime (630), and Budget (640).
The Marketing Canvas Method is a complete marketing strategy framework built around 6 meta-categories, 24 dimensions, and 9 strategic archetypes. Learn more at marketingcanvas.net or in the book Marketing Strategy, Programmed by Laurent Bouty.
Marketing Canvas Method - Question - Marketing Budget
Marketing Canvas - Pricing
Pricing errors run in both directions. Underpricing signals low quality and leaves margin on the table. Overpricing creates resentment no feature list can fix. Dimension 330 of the Marketing Canvas scores whether your pricing actively supports your positioning — or quietly contradicts it.
About the Marketing Canvas Method
This article covers dimension 330 — Pricing, part of the
Value Proposition meta-category. The Marketing Canvas Method structures
marketing strategy across 24 dimensions and 9 strategic archetypes.
Full framework reference at
marketingcanvas.net →
·
Get the book →
In a nutshell
Prices (dimension 330) scores whether your pricing strategy reflects the value you deliver, aligns with customer willingness to pay, and supports your positioning. The foundational question is not "is the price low?" It is: does the customer perceive more value than the price asks, relative to alternatives?
That reframing is the entire point of treating pricing as a strategic dimension rather than a finance function. Price is not just a revenue variable — it is a signal. It communicates quality, confirms positioning, and either reinforces or contradicts everything else in the value proposition.
In the Marketing Canvas, Prices sits within the Value Proposition meta-category alongside Features (310), Emotions (320), and Proof (340). It is the dimension that makes the value proposition credible or exposes it as overclaimed.
Pricing errors run in both directions
The most common framing of a pricing problem is "our price is too high." The canonical view is more demanding: pricing errors run symmetrically in both directions, and both are strategically damaging.
Overpricing creates a gap between perceived value and cost that even strong features cannot bridge. When price exceeds what customers perceive as justified by the value, the result is not premium positioning — it is resentment, abandoned trials, and word-of-mouth that damages rather than builds.
Underpricing is equally problematic and more often overlooked. A price that is too low signals low quality and leaves margin on the table. It undermines positioning — a brand that claims "indoor health protection" at commodity pricing sends a contradictory signal. Customers use price as a quality heuristic. A low price says: "we don't fully believe in what we built either."
The diagnostic question is not where the price sits in absolute terms. It is whether the customer perceives more value than the price asks, compared to every alternative they are considering. A €15 artisanal coffee is not expensive if the customer perceives it as worth €20. A €5 coffee is overpriced if the customer sees it as worth €3.
Score negative if pricing is set by finance without customer input, or if there is a disconnect between price and positioning. Score positive when pricing actively supports the strategic position and customers perceive fair value — not cheap, not resentment-inducing, but justified.
The price/positioning test
The sharpest diagnostic in dimension 330 is also the simplest:
A premium position with discount pricing creates cognitive dissonance. A value position with premium pricing creates resentment. The price must match the promise.
This test catches misalignments that are obvious once named but invisible in day-to-day operations. A B2B software company that positions itself as "enterprise-grade" but prices below mid-market confuses the procurement team — the price contradicts the claim. A cleaning service that positions itself as health-protection specialists but prices below the eco-follower in the market undermines its own differentiation before a customer conversation begins.
Run the test against your own positioning: if a prospect saw only your price — before any marketing, any features list, any proof — would the price itself reinforce or contradict your positioning? If it contradicts, dimension 330 requires attention regardless of what the rest of the value proposition delivers.
M8 and dimension 330: diagnosis vs. strategy
In the Marketing Canvas Method, pricing is measured twice — at different points in the process, for different purposes.
M8 (Perceived Price) is calculated in Step 1 (Strategic Context Mapping). It normalises your actual price per unit relative to the highest and lowest prices in your competitive set, producing a score from −12 (feels very cheap) to +12 (feels very expensive). M8 is the diagnosis: it shows where your brand sits on the customer's mental price scale before any strategic decisions are made.
Dimension 330 is scored in Step 3 (the Vital Audit). It scores whether your pricing strategy — how you set, communicate, and manage price — actively serves your Step 2 goal. M8 is the starting position. Dimension 330 is the question: are you managing it intentionally?
For Green Clean, M8 is +3.0 — slightly above mid-market, well below EcoPure at +12.0. That is a deliberate positioning choice: accessible enough to attract health-conscious families who cannot justify the premium leader, differentiated enough that "eco-follower" NatureFresh at −6.0 cannot compete on the same terms. Dimension 330 scores whether Green Clean has made that a strategic choice — informed by customer WTP research, aligned with their health-first positioning, and sustainable relative to their cost structure — or whether +3.0 is simply where they ended up.
The four pricing anchors
The Marketing Canvas scores dimension 330 against four sub-questions that together define whether pricing is strategic or accidental:
Value vs. alternatives (331): Does the customer perceive more value than the price asks, compared to the next best alternative? This is the core question. It requires knowing both your own perceived value (M9) and your competitors' — and understanding whether the price premium or discount relative to alternatives is perceived as justified.
Willingness to pay (332): Is the pricing strategy grounded in customer WTP research, not internal cost-plus assumptions? WTP is not what customers say they would pay in a survey. It is the revealed willingness — what they actually pay, what they pay for competitors, and where the price sensitivity curve breaks. WTP research requires customer interviews, competitive analysis, and price sensitivity testing. Without it, dimension 330 cannot score above +1.
Cost coverage (333): Does the price account for all costs associated with delivering the value proposition — including the hidden costs of service, support, onboarding, and relationship management that are routinely underestimated? A price that does not cover full costs is not a strategic choice. It is a delayed crisis.
Positioning alignment (334): Is the price consistent with brand positioning and category goals? This is the price/positioning test applied systematically. Premium positioning requires premium-range pricing. Value positioning requires price-accessible pricing. Misalignment here is not a pricing problem — it is a brand architecture problem that dimension 330 surfaces.
Prices in the Marketing Canvas
The canonical question
Does your pricing strategy reflect the value you deliver, align with customer willingness to pay, and support your positioning?
Prices appears in the Vital 8 of three archetypes in roles that reflect its strategic weight:
Primary Accelerator for A6 (Value Harvester): The Value Harvester is extracting maximum cash flow from an existing customer base. Pricing power — the ability to raise prices, introduce premium tiers, and increase ARPU without triggering churn — is the primary growth mechanism. For A6, dimension 330 is not defensive. It is the offensive lever. Every pricing improvement directly converts to margin.
Secondary Brake for A2 (Efficiency Machine): An Efficiency Machine competes on cost leadership. The pricing risk is margin erosion — the downward pressure of competitive price-matching that can turn cost leadership into a race to zero. Dimension 330 scores whether the pricing strategy protects the margin structure that makes efficiency sustainable. For A2, price must be low enough to win volume without being so low that the cost model collapses.
Secondary Brake for A8 (Niche Expert): For the Niche Expert, the ability to raise prices is the proof that expertise is real. A niche authority that charges the same as a generalist is signalling that the niche does not command a premium — which undermines the authority itself. Hermès raises prices 5–8% annually and the market absorbs it. That is not arrogance. That is a dimension 330 score of +3 demonstrating that the niche position is genuine.
Growth Driver for A2 and A8: In both, pricing optimisation — raising prices toward the WTP ceiling, introducing tiered offerings, or expanding into premium segments — is a direct revenue lever that does not require new customer acquisition.
Statements for self-assessment
Rate your agreement on a scale from −3 (completely disagree) to +3 (completely agree). There is no zero — the Marketing Canvas forces a directional position on every dimension.
Note on Detailed Track scoring: if averaging sub-question scores produces a mathematical zero, the method rounds to −1. A split score means the dimension is not clearly helping your goal — and "not clearly helping" requires the same investigation as "hurting."
Interpreting your scores
Negative scores (−1 to −3): Pricing is misaligned with customer WTP, disconnected from positioning, or set by cost and competitive reference alone. The likely result: either margin erosion (underpricing) or purchase friction and resentment (overpricing). Pricing is not functioning as a strategic asset.
Positive scores (+1 to +3): Pricing is grounded in WTP research, consistent with positioning, covers full costs, and actively reinforces the value proposition rather than contradicting it. Customers perceive the price as justified. The price/positioning test passes without qualification.
Case study: Green Clean
Green Clean is a fictional eco-friendly residential cleaning service used as the recurring worked example throughout the Marketing Canvas Method.
Score: −2 to −1 (Weak) Green Clean's price of $200 per visit was set by looking at EcoPure ($260) and splitting the difference with NatureFresh ($140). No WTP research was conducted. No customer was asked what they would pay for a service that could verifiably protect indoor health rather than just clean with eco products. The price covers costs — just. But it does not reflect the value premium Green Clean is attempting to claim. The health-first positioning demands a price signal that says "this is a specialist service, not a cleaning commodity." At $200 in a market where the eco-follower charges $140, the $60 premium is too modest to reinforce the category distinction and too large to be dismissed as rounding error. The price is caught between value and premium without committing to either. Pricing is set by cost and competitive reference, not by customer WTP or positioning logic.
Score: +1 to +2 (Developing) Green Clean has conducted basic WTP research — six customer interviews and a price sensitivity survey of 40 existing customers. The data suggests that health-conscious parents with children under 10 have a WTP ceiling of approximately $230 for a verified health-protection service, compared to $170 for a standard eco-cleaning service. This validates a $200 entry price as accessible to the primary segment. But the full pricing architecture is incomplete: there is no premium tier for customers who want quarterly indoor air quality testing, no subscription discount structure that rewards commitment, and no articulated reason in the sales conversation for why $200 reflects value rather than cost. The price is in the right zone. The strategy around it is not yet complete.
Score: +2 to +3 (Strong) Green Clean's pricing architecture is fully aligned with positioning and WTP evidence. The standard service at $200 is priced as the accessible entry to health-first home care — above the eco-follower (NatureFresh at $140) to reinforce the quality signal, below the premium leader (EcoPure at $260) to remain accessible to the early believer segment. A premium tier at $240 includes quarterly indoor air quality baseline testing — a feature that translates health-first positioning into a tangible deliverable and captures WTP from the highest-intent segment. An annual subscription at $185/visit rewards commitment while improving LTV. The sales conversation anchors the $200 price to the university-validated formula and third-party certifications — making the price a consequence of quality, not a financial decision. Customers who ask "why not NatureFresh for $140?" receive a specific answer about what the $60 buys. Churn is lower in the premium tier than in the standard tier — confirming that the pricing architecture is reinforcing, not diluting, loyalty.
Connected dimensions
Prices does not operate in isolation. Four dimensions connect most directly:
310 — Features: Features justify the price. A unique functional benefit — the only independently validated non-toxic formula in the region — is the justification for a price premium. Without a unique feature, premium pricing is a claim without a foundation.
220 — Positioning: Price must match position. The price/positioning test is the most direct connection between these two dimensions. Positioning defines the promise. Prices either confirms or contradicts it at the first moment of commercial truth.
340 — Proof: Proofs reduce price sensitivity. A customer who has seen the university validation data, the B-Corp certification, and the Family Health Report is less price-sensitive than one who hasn't. Proof shifts the perceived value upward, which expands the WTP range and makes the price feel justified rather than expensive.
620 — ARPU: Pricing directly drives revenue per user. Every pricing decision — entry price, premium tier, subscription structure, annual increase — translates directly into ARPU. Dimension 330 and dimension 620 should be reviewed together: the pricing architecture is the primary lever for ARPU improvement without requiring new customer acquisition.
Conclusion
Prices is the dimension that either validates or undermines everything else in the value proposition. A product can have a unique feature, a designed emotional benefit, and a compelling purpose — and a price that signals none of it is real.
The strategic discipline is not to price low enough to be accessible or high enough to be premium. It is to price at the level where the customer perceives the value as justified relative to alternatives — and to ensure that perception is managed actively, not left to whatever the market average happens to be.
The price/positioning test is the fastest audit available: premium position + discount price = cognitive dissonance. Value position + premium price = resentment. When the price matches the promise, dimension 330 is working. When it doesn't, everything upstream is harder.
Sources
Thomas Nagle, Georg Müller, The Strategy and Tactics of Pricing, Routledge, 6th edition, 2018
Hermann Simon, Confessions of the Pricing Man, Springer, 2015
Marketing Canvas Method, Appendix E — Dimension 330: Prices, Laurent Bouty, 2026
About this dimension
Dimension 330 — Prices is part of the Value Proposition meta-category (300) in the Marketing Canvas Method. The Value Proposition meta-category contains four dimensions: Features (310), Emotions (320), Prices (330), and Proof (340).
The Marketing Canvas Method is a complete marketing strategy framework built around 6 meta-categories, 24 dimensions, and 9 strategic archetypes. Learn more at marketingcanvas.net or in the book Marketing Strategy, Programmed by Laurent Bouty.
Marketing Canvas - Engagement
Satisfaction and engagement are not the same thing. A customer can score 7/10 on satisfaction and never return. Dimension 140 of the Marketing Canvas explains the difference, how to measure it, and why engagement is the leading indicator that predicts churn before it appears in the revenue line.
About the Marketing Canvas Method
This article covers dimension 140 — Engagement, part of the
Customers meta-category. The Marketing Canvas Method structures
marketing strategy across 24 dimensions and 9 strategic archetypes.
Full framework reference at
marketingcanvas.net →
·
Get the book →
In a nutshell
Engagement (dimension 140) measures the quality and depth of the relationship between brand and customer. Not satisfaction. A customer can be satisfied and completely disengaged.
That distinction is the entire point of this dimension. Satisfaction measures how a customer felt about the last interaction. Engagement measures whether the customer is actively participating in the relationship — recommending the brand unprompted, providing feedback, returning without being asked, defending the brand when challenged. These are different signals, and they require different interventions.
In the Marketing Canvas, Engagement sits within the Customers meta-category alongside Job To Be Done (110), Aspirations (120), and Pains & Gains (130). It is the last of the four Customer dimensions — and the one that translates everything upstream into a measurable, trackable relationship signal.
Engagement as a leading indicator of churn
The most commercially important insight in this dimension is also the least intuitive: engagement is a leading indicator of churn, while revenue is a lagging one.
Churn does not happen suddenly. It is preceded by a sequence of declining engagement signals — fewer referrals, slower response to outreach, silence where there used to be feedback, reduced product usage depth, a shift from promoter to passive. By the time churn appears in the revenue line, the customer made the decision weeks or months earlier. Companies that track engagement signals catch that decision in progress. Companies that track only revenue discover it after the fact.
Research consistently confirms this pattern. A 2025 analysis of customer engagement as a retention predictor found that engagement metrics — frequency of use, depth of feature adoption, responsiveness to outreach — signal churn risk before any revenue indicator does. Customers who begin ignoring key features are significantly more likely to churn; those who maintain consistent usage patterns, even at modest levels, renew at materially higher rates.
The practical implication for the Marketing Canvas: a company that scores Engagement at −1 is not just describing a weak customer relationship today. It is describing a churn problem that will show up in User Lifetime (630) figures within the next 6–12 months.
What engagement actually measures
Engagement is active participation. The four observable forms:
Recommendation — does the customer refer the brand to others without being asked? Unprompted referral is the strongest engagement signal because it requires the customer to put their own reputation behind the brand. Green Clean's 35% referral rate by 2024 was the clearest evidence of high engagement — customers were actively recruiting new ones.
Feedback — does the customer respond to outreach, complete surveys, attend review sessions, and provide input into product or service evolution? A customer who stops providing feedback is not neutral — they have disengaged. Silence is a signal.
Return without prompt — does the customer come back without a campaign, a discount, or a re-engagement effort? Repeat purchase driven by marketing spend is retention. Repeat purchase driven by habit and relationship is engagement.
Defence under challenge — does the customer defend the brand when it is criticised? This is the tribal signal. Customers who have moved from satisfied to engaged will tell a sceptical colleague "actually, here's why I use them" without being asked to.
The NPS instrument
The classic measurement tool for Engagement is the Net Promoter Score — a single question that segments customers into three groups based on their likelihood to recommend:
Promoters (score 9–10): actively recommend the brand to others. The growth engine. Every promoter generates acquisition at zero additional cost. The strategic goal is to grow this group and give them the tools to advocate effectively.
Passives (score 7–8): satisfied but not engaged. They stay until something better comes along or a pain accumulates. They do not recommend, but they do not damage the brand either. The strategic goal is to understand what would move them to promoter status.
Detractors (score 0–6): dissatisfied and potentially vocal. They represent churn risk and reputational risk simultaneously. The strategic goal is not to ignore them — detractor verbatims are the richest source of improvement intelligence in any customer base.
The NPS score itself (% Promoters − % Detractors) is useful as a tracking metric. What matters more in the MCM audit is the ratio between the two groups and whether the company has systems in place to act on what both groups are saying. A high NPS with no feedback loop is a number, not a strategy.
Score negative if engagement is unmeasured, or measured only through satisfaction surveys. Score positive when the company tracks promoter/detractor ratios, acts on the feedback, and can demonstrate a link between engagement scores and business outcomes.
Engagement in the Marketing Canvas
The canonical question
How deeply connected are your customers to your brand?
Engagement appears in the Vital 8 of three archetypes — and the roles span the full range of urgency:
Fatal Brake for A3 (Brand Evangelist): The Brand Evangelist archetype is built entirely on tribal belonging. If the tribe is not engaged, there is no tribe — just customers who happen to have bought the same product. Patagonia's NPS of 70+ and customer retention of 82% by 2022 are not incidental. They are the strategic output of an engagement system built around Worn Wear, environmental activism, and community events that make customers active participants rather than passive purchasers. For A3, a low Engagement score does not mean "improve the relationship." It means the entire archetype is failing.
Primary Accelerator for A4 (Stagnant Leader): A leader experiencing stagnation faces a leaky bucket — churn is rising while acquisition is fighting to refill it. Deepening engagement with the existing customer base is the primary defence. It is cheaper to re-engage a passive customer than to acquire a new one. It is far cheaper to convert a detractor's concern into product improvement than to lose them and acquire a replacement. For A4, Engagement is not a nice-to-have — it is the mechanism that slows the leak while the experience is being fixed.
Primary Accelerator for A7 (Scale-Up Guardian): Hypergrowth tends to destroy the relationships that created growth. As teams scale, as processes become standardised, as the personal touch disappears, early adopters shift from promoters to passives. The Scale-Up Guardian's specific challenge is maintaining engagement quality while growing volume. Tracking engagement signals during rapid growth is the early warning system that tells leadership whether the brand is scaling its relationship — or just scaling its revenue.
Statements for self-assessment
Rate your agreement on a scale from −3 (completely disagree) to +3 (completely agree). There is no zero — the Marketing Canvas forces a directional position on every dimension.
Note on Detailed Track scoring: if averaging sub-question scores produces a mathematical zero, the method rounds to −1. A split score means the dimension is not clearly helping your goal — and "not clearly helping" requires the same investigation as "hurting."
Interpreting your scores
Negative scores (−1 to −3): Engagement is unmeasured, or measured only through satisfaction surveys that don't distinguish between satisfied-and-disengaged and genuinely loyal. Detractors are not being systematically identified or addressed. Promoters are not being activated. Churn signals are invisible until they appear in the revenue line — by which point the decision has already been made.
Positive scores (+1 to +3): Engagement is tracked systematically through promoter/detractor ratios and behavioural signals. Detractor feedback feeds directly into service and product improvements. Promoters have tools and reasons to advocate. The company can demonstrate a measurable link between engagement scores and retention outcomes. Engagement is functioning as the leading indicator it is designed to be.Case study: Green Clean’s Engagement strategy
Misaligned understanding (-3, -2, -1): Green Clean lacks the tools to measure engagement and struggles to address customer dissatisfaction. Detractors outnumber promoters, harming the brand’s reputation, while sustainability efforts are absent from its engagement strategy.
Surface understanding (0): Green Clean uses basic tools like surveys but lacks a cohesive approach to managing detractors and empowering promoters. Sustainability is a peripheral concern, limiting its appeal to eco-conscious customers.
Deep understanding (+1, +2, +3): Green Clean leverages NPS and behavioral data to track engagement effectively. It proactively resolves detractor concerns, encourages promoters to share positive reviews, and integrates sustainability into its messaging, fostering strong customer relationships.
Case study: Green Clean
Green Clean is a fictional eco-friendly residential cleaning service used as the recurring worked example throughout the Marketing Canvas Method.
Score: −2 to −1 (Weak) Green Clean has no formal engagement measurement. The team sends an annual satisfaction survey — three questions, 22% response rate — and reads the results as confirmation that customers are happy. There is no NPS measurement. No promoter/detractor tracking. No system for capturing or acting on feedback between services. When a customer cancels, the cancellation is processed without any outreach to understand why. The churn rate of 20% in 2021 is treated as an industry benchmark issue, not an engagement signal. The team cannot name a single specific action taken in response to customer feedback in the past twelve months. Engagement is not measured. Engagement is not managed.
Score: +1 to +2 (Developing) By 2022, Green Clean has introduced NPS measurement after each service visit. They have identified a promoter group (score 9–10) representing 38% of customers, and a detractor group (score 0–6) representing 14%. The promoter group is being asked for referrals informally. The detractor group is contacted by the founder within 48 hours of a low score — a process that is recovering approximately 40% of those customers. A quarterly feedback session with a sample of long-term customers is feeding service improvements. But the system is still primarily reactive: engagement is being tracked, but not yet used as a leading churn indicator. The referral rate sits at 18% — growing, but not yet the dominant acquisition channel.
Score: +2 to +3 (Strong) Green Clean's engagement system is proactive and closed-loop. NPS is tracked after every service visit and monthly at the account level. Detractor verbatims are reviewed weekly and feed directly into the service improvement backlog — four product changes in 2023 traced directly to detractor feedback. Promoters receive structured advocacy tools: referral cards, a community group, and the option to share their Family Health Report data publicly with anonymisation. The referral rate reached 35% by 2024, making word-of-mouth the largest single acquisition channel. Churn fell from 20% to 12% between 2021 and 2024 — a decline that correlated directly with the improvement in NPS and the reduction in the detractor-to-promoter ratio. Engagement is the company's most reliable leading indicator of both retention and growth.
Connected dimensions
Engagement does not operate in isolation. Four dimensions connect most directly:
130 — Pains & Gains: Engagement drops when pains accumulate. The most reliable way to convert a promoter into a passive — or a passive into a detractor — is to leave a mapped pain unaddressed. Pains & Gains research identifies what to fix; Engagement measurement tracks whether fixing it is working.
510 — Listening (VOC): VOC systems feed engagement data. The feedback loop that makes engagement actionable requires a systematic listening infrastructure — not just NPS, but the full VOC stack that captures what customers say, where they say it, and at which stage of the journey.
630 — User Lifetime: Engagement predicts lifetime. The correlation between promoter status and customer lifetime value is well-established. A customer who actively recommends the brand has already demonstrated a level of commitment that translates directly into longer retention and higher ARPU.
520 — Stories: Engaged customers become storytellers. The most valuable content the brand can produce is a promoter's authentic account of why they use and recommend it. Engagement measurement identifies who those promoters are. Stories strategy gives them a stage.
Conclusion
Satisfaction is easy to achieve and easy to mistake for something more. A customer who rates the last service 7/10 and never comes back is satisfied. A customer who rates it 6/10, calls to say why, and stays for three more years after the issue is resolved is engaged.
The dimension that distinguishes between those two customers — and builds systems to identify, track, and act on the difference — is Engagement. It is the Customer meta-category's mechanism for translating everything upstream (JTBD clarity, aspiration alignment, pain elimination) into a measurable relationship.
For archetypes where brand loyalty is the strategic imperative — A3, A4, A7 — a low Engagement score is the diagnostic that explains why the strategy is not working, even when the product is sound. Fix Engagement, and the downstream metrics follow. Leave it unmeasured, and the churn signal arrives in the revenue line: accurate, too late, and expensive to reverse.
Sources
Frederick Reichheld, "The One Number You Need to Grow", Harvard Business Review, December 2003 — hbr.org
Stellafai, "6 Leading Indicators to Accurately Predict Renewal and Churn", 2025 — stellafai.com
Marketing Canvas Method, Appendix E — Dimension 140: Engagement, Laurent Bouty, 2026
About this dimension
Dimension 140 — Engagement is part of the Customers meta-category (100) in the Marketing Canvas Method. The Customers meta-category contains four dimensions: Job To Be Done (110), Aspirations (120), Pains & Gains (130), and Engagement (140).
The Marketing Canvas Method is a complete marketing strategy framework built around 6 meta-categories, 24 dimensions, and 9 strategic archetypes. Learn more at marketingcanvas.net or in the book Marketing Strategy, Programmed by Laurent Bouty.
Marketing Strategy Execution - How to start a movement?
Most of the time, I am facing the situation where I need to engage people in executing the strategy. Easy to say but probably the most difficult part of being a CMO (make it happen).
Most of the time, I am facing the situation where I need to engage people in executing the strategy. Easy to say but probably the most difficult part of being a CMO (make it happen). One of my friend (@alainthys) showed me this video few years ago and it is so true!
When working on an innovative project or on a new commercial activity, who might be your first follower? Your existing client (a co-creation model)? Your sponsor (classical Corporate Model)? Your peers (collaborative model)? Anyone, that trust your idea?
So my question is: have you found your first follower? could you tell us what is his/her usual profile?
source: https://www.ted.com/talks/derek_sivers_how_to_start_a_movement?language=en
Marketing Strategy for Millennials from Marketing Cloud
Interesting Infographic from Marketing Cloud proposing 5 steps to creating your Marketing Strategy for Millennials. As you might have noticed, I am advocating the use of the Marketing Canvas for designing your Marketing Strategy. Let's check whether these steps fit into the process?
Interesting Infographic from Marketing Cloud proposing 5 steps to creating your Marketing Strategy for Millennials. As you might have noticed, I am advocating the use of the Marketing Canvas for designing your Marketing Strategy. Let's check whether these steps fit into the process?
- Step 1 is definitely a no-brainer. Data and customer knowledge will help you to be very specific when discussing canvas. Dimensions like Humans (if you want to uncover key insights and customer preferences), Journey (if you want to design great customer experience), Value proposition (if you want to design the most relevant offers) and conversation (if you want to be at the right place, right time with the right subject) will help you.
- Step 2 is clearly identified in the canvas: Channel (in Journey), Content & Stories (Conversation), Media (Shared and Earned) and finally the global topic of conversations.
- Step 3 is also covered in Engagement (word of mouth), Influencers (Conversations), Proofs (Value Proposition) and Moment of Truth (Journey)
- Step 4 mentions that technology is key for millennials. It is true and it will influence preferred Channels (Journey), Media (Conversation) and Features (Value Proposition) but don't forget that Job To Be Done is why they engage with you and what problem they are trying to solve.
- Step 5 is all about your Purpose (Brand) and Listening (conversation). I am not a fan about education as I believe we don't educate customers but we engage them.
The conclusion is that the Marketing Canvas fits perfectly with these steps and can be applied for Millennials. Finally, I would like to mention that in the Budget dimensions, they are 2 important topics (capabilities and people) where you should invest for having the required tools and skills in your company if you want to do all of this.
More on Marketing Cloud: https://www.salesforce.com/products/marketing-cloud/best-practices/millenial-marketing-strategy/
3 Cs in a Digital World
Interesting article from Roland Berger Consultants about Sales in a Digital World. Their thesis is that you need to master 3 Cs if you want to have a voice in this new world:
- Develop the Customer Base: It is definitely in line with what I am preaching. You should not only focus on acquisition but also on stimulation and retention. The CLV dimension of the Marketing Canvas is telling you how much you perform versus your ambition;
- Orchestrate the Channel: I also agree but I would extend this to Orchestrate the Customer Journey as it is much broader than channel and it is integrating elements like Brand experience, touch-points, emotions and wow moments.
- Manage the complexity: it is maybe fluffy as notion. We all know that we should manage the complexity, the question is how should I do that. One possible answer is in the article when they discussed centralisation. I think the key element there is to automate your processes (BPM, scripting, algorithms, ...) in order to reduce the chaos and uncertainty. but don't forget to keep the human part.
Source: Roland Berger, Think Act, The digital future of B2B sales
Questions you should ask with the Marketing Canvas
Marketing canvas is an easy yet powerful tool you can use for assessing your Marketing Strategy. It works for small and very large companies. It can be used by novices or experts. A list of key questions to be asked can be found in this article. Enjoy!
Below you will find a list of questions that will help you during the assessment of your marketing strategy with the Marketing Canvas. How does it work? You take the Canvas and go through all dimensions (after having defined your ambition - see article) asking all questions. You can have 2 potential answers for each question:
- I don't know or No then it is playing against your ambition. It is a Brake and the colour is RED. This is something you should improve or change if you want to achieve your ambition.
- Yes then it is playing in favour of your ambition. It is an Accelerator and the colour is GREEN. This is something you can leverage for achieving your ambition.
Customer Life Time Value
- Is your MARKET growing? The market situation plays an important role when you are trying to grow. A saturated market will play against you while a new and growing market will play for you. Understanding this will help you when building your marketing strategy.
- Is it easy and/or cheap to attract new USER ? Getting new customers has a price and could take time. If your customer acquisition is cheap and easy it will most probably play for you while if it takes time and/or it is expensive it will play against you when building your marketing strategy.
- Are you maximizing the ARPU of your user? ARPU stands for Average Revenue Per User. It is a combination of transactions (how frequent people buy products/services) and prices (how much they pay when they buy something). If you believe you are maximizing the ARPU of your users, it will play for you. If not (or worst if it will decrease), it will play against you.
- Is it easy to extend the LIFETIME (reduce churn) of your user? Keeping your users will generally play an important role in your financials. The more users you have, the more revenues are at stake. If keeping your users is expensive and difficult, it will play against you. If it is easy and/or cheap, it will play for you.
Human
- Is your current understanding of the JOB TO BE DONE of your users helping you to achieve your ambition? Knowing the Job To Be Done of your future and existing users is fundamental. This might help you to identify the untapped area or new insights that you could leverage. Could you leverage it for your ambition? If yes, it means that you can create value by addressing the job to be done.
- Is your current understanding of the ASPIRATIONS of your users helping you to achieve your ambition? Knowing the aspirations of your future and existing users will help you to offer more than products or services and contribute to their lives. Do you know them? Can you leverage it?
- Is your current understanding of the PAINS & GAINS of your users helping you to achieve your ambition? Getting the Job The Done has some pains (negative emotions) but also gains (positive emotions). If you have identified them and you are capable to leverage it, it will play for you. Otherwise, it will play against you.
- Is the ENGAGEMENT of your users helping you to achieve your ambition? Knowing how much your users are engaged (NPS could help you) and being able to leverage it will certainly play in your favor.
Brand
- Is the PURPOSE of your Brand helping you to achieve your ambition? Having a purpose is probably the most important asset for your long-term business. Great companies are crystal clear about why they exist! Do you know your purpose? Is it robust enough and clear enough? Can you leverage it further for creating value? Not knowing or having a weak purpose will certainly play against your ambition. A strong purpose will help you when looking for extra value!
- Is the POSITIONING of your Brand helping you to achieve your ambition? How to address your category will help you make choices and clarify how to stand out from the competition. Are you a leader (setting the standards), are you a challenger (playing the leader game but challenging it) or are you a game changer (redefining the game)? Can you leverage your positioning further (be more leader, challenger or game changer)? Not knowing this or answering no means that you need to revisit your current positioning for creating value.
- Are the VALUES of your Brand helping you to achieve your ambition? Your values are your translation of your purpose into key behaviors. Most of the commercial activities are delivered through behaviors (from people or from systems). Do you know your values? Are they helping you for creating more value?
- Is the IDENTITY of your Brand helping you to achieve your ambition? Your identity is how you translate your purpose into an image. Not having a clear identity or having an identity that couldn't be leveraged will block you when trying to create more value.
Value Proposition
- Are the FEATURES of your Value Proposition helping you to achieve your ambition? Do you address the right functional features? are they aligned with your humans? Can you answer this question? Can you become more unique and different from the competitions? Not knowing if your features (functional characteristics of your products and services) could help you to create more value or answering no means that it will not help you when you will look for extra value.
- Are the EMOTIONS of your Value Proposition helping you to achieve your ambition? Today, differentiation comes through emotions and not functional features. Do you know if you deliver the right emotional features? Can you leverage more the emotional dimensions in your value proposition for creating value? Answering yes means that you can create extra value through the emotional dimension of your value proposition.
- Are the PRICES of your Value Proposition helping you to achieve your ambition? Your pricing can be a strong brake for creating extra value or a strong enabler. Do you know where your current pricing is creating value? Can you leverage it further? Being able to leverage your pricing for creating new value is a key asset for your future.
- Are the PROOFS of your Value Proposition helping you to achieve your ambition? Do you have enough evidence that helps people understanding the value you create with your value proposition? Can you leverage your value proposition with more or better proofs?
Journey
- Are the MOMENTS of your user journey helping you to achieve your ambition? Moments are the different steps a user is going through when he is trying to solve his problem. When using Mental Models, we can identify all key moments a user is going through and try to formulate the best brand experience possible. Do you know all moments of your users? Can you capture more value through these moments?
- Is the EXPERIENCE of your user's journey helping you to achieve your ambition? As a Brand, you need to formulate a clear and articulated answer at each moment. These answers should reflect customer identity, satisfy the objectives and meet expectation. Do you have orchestrated answer (or is it random)? Can you capture more value through the experience of your user's journey?
- Are the CHANNELS of your user journey helping you to achieve your ambition? The number of channels that can be used for transacting with a brand is growing. And each user is free to use channel(s) of his choice. Do you have an answer for all potential channels? Do you orchestrate these channels? Can you capture more value through these channels?
- Are the MOMENTS OF TRUTH of your user journey helping you to achieve your ambition? Providing an orchestrated experience is already a great achievement. Next step is to transform some moments into Moments of Truth (also referred as like moments or wow moments). Do you know if you offer Moments of Truth? Can you capture more value through these moments of truth?
Conversation
- Is the way you are currently LISTENING TO your users helping you to achieve your ambition? How can you have great conversations with your users if you don't listen to their voices? Do you systematically capture the voice of your users? Do you capture more value by listening to your users?
- Are your CONTENT & STORIES for your users helping you to achieve your ambition? Monologues are no more working for engaging users with your brand. Should you have contents and stories? Do you know if you have content & stories? Do you capture as much as you can value through content & stories?
- Is the current use of your MEDIA helping you to achieve your ambition? You can place your content & stories through different media: Paid, Owned, Earned or Shared? Do you know which media you are using? Do you capture as much as you can value through your media?
- Are your INFLUENCERS helping you to achieve your ambition? People are trusting people. Do you know if you are using influencers? Do you capture as much as you can value through influencers?
Budget
- Is your budget for Marketing FEES helping you to achieve your ambition? If you want to propagate your content, stories, and offers, you should balance your media investment between Owned, Paid, Earned and Shared. Have you well balanced your investments amongst these media? Is it enough for your ambition (have you compared this investment with your competitors) ?
- Is your budget for Marketing PEOPLE (internal & external) helping you to achieve your ambition? To make things happening, you need a team (either insourced or outsourced). Do you have enough people for achieving your ambition?
- Is your budget for Marketing KNOWLEDGE helping you to achieve your ambition? It is important to collect systematically enough knowledge through research, training, bootcamp or even consulting projects for achieving your target. Do you have properly invest in these topics for your ambition.
- Is your budget for Marketing CAPABILITIES helping you to achieve your ambition? More and more marketers have a leading role when defining the technical roadmap of the company because of the impact on the customers (web site, mobile applications, automation, CRM and lead generation software, database, ...) Do you have invested enough in these topics for your ambition?
Why you need a bold question for your Marketing Strategy?
What is the best way to start defining the marketing strategy of your company, business or activity? My proposal is to start with a bold strategic question! Why?
What is the best way to start defining the marketing strategy of your company, business or activity? My proposal is to start with a bold strategic question! Why?
Because the objective of your strategy is to achieve an ambition and most probably a financial ambition. Whether you are a startup or a stock listed company, you have to achieve a financial ambition if you want to stay in business. Thus first hypothesis is to have a financial ambition and preferably S.M.A.R.T. one.
Financial Ambition of Your Strategy
Then let's imagine, you don't do any strategy and you let the business in free wheel (no plan). Most probably you will face problems and situations (external or internal) that will block you to achieve your ambition. I suggest that you highlight the biggest problem, your #1 fear for your business. Thus second hypothesis is that you need to define your biggest fear as the context where you will do your strategy.
Biggest commercial fear you have
Question
HOW CAN I (FINANCIAL AMBITION) IN (TOP #1 FEAR) ?
Examples
HOW CAN I GROWTH MY REVENUE BY 5% IN AN AUTOMATED AND DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT? (Shoe Store)
HOW CAN I PROTECT MY REVENUE NEXT YEAR IN A MARKET WHERE UBER IS ARRIVING? (Taxi company)
HOW CAN I BE PROFITABLE AFTER 1 YEAR IN A MARKET WHERE NOBODY KNOWS ME YET ? (Startup company)
Quote
Marketing Strategy should start with a bold question
How To Define Your Commercial Plan for Your Startup with Marketing Canvas?
When you work on your commercial strategy for your startup, you can facilitate this conversation with using the Marketing Canvas (more on the canvas here). Please find below 10 steps you should follow:
KEY QUESTIONS TO BE ASKED
What is your goal? Big Idea? Define a question that will clarify your projected future like How can we achieve 1M€ after one year of operation? How can we generate 5% growth next year? How can we differentiate our brand in a digital world where predictive technologies driven by AI will become a standard?
What is the problem you are trying to solve? Clarify the job to be done for your customers.
Who is our buyer and user? Define your persona.
If not you who else? Define the category where you are playing and what are the alternatives for your buyer.
How do you want to be remembered? What people will say about you? Your BRAND
What is your answer to the problem your buyer has? What is your value proposition? Do you have USP, ESP, Clear Pricing and Proofs?
What experience people will have with you? Will it generate sales and engagement? JOURNEY
How do you discuss with your buyer? Do you have conversations? Do you listen? Do you have content, stories, influencers? Which media do you use?
Does it make any financial sense? What is your Marketing Budget and Revenue?
If you don't think it all works, iterate one more time
PROCESS FOR ZERO APPROACH
As a startup, you should define your strategic hypothesis. It is slightly different than an existing business because you are starting from a white page.
Part 1- Target, Positioning
Define your key customer target (JTBD, ASPIRATION, PAINS & GAINS). As you are starting your business, you have no information on ENGAGEMENT.
Define your Brand strategy (PURPOSE and POSITIONING) and explain how you will differentiate your brand versus competitors. Explain what could be the VALUES of this brand and your IDENTITY strategy.
Define your Value Proposition (FEATURES, EMOTIONS and PRICING). Describe core, differentiated and unique features/emotions to support your Brand Strategy, matching your customer target and helping you to achieve your financial objectives. Do you have any PROOFS supporting your value proposition?
Part 2- Go To Market
Define your go to market approach and more specifically: Describe funnel journey (pre and post purchase) for your go to market: MOMENTS, EXPERIENCE, CHANNEL and MAGIC. Don't forget to align this with your brand strategy.
Describe your conversation strategy for your go to market. LISTENING, CONTENT, MEDIA and INFLUENCERS if any.
Part 3 - Metrics
Define your hypothesis in terms of metrics for your business: ACQUISITION (speed of acquisition), ARPU (average spending for each customer on the 12 months), LIFETIME (your churn assumption) and BUDGET (amount of € needed for supporting your strategy).
ASSESS YOUR ZERO APPROACH WITH YOUR TEAMS
Use the canvas and answer to these questions using all dimension while asking the same question:
Will my .... help me to achieve my goal?
RED: Not at all; GREEN: Definitely
Visualise your Commercial Strategy on Marketing Canvas
RED dimension must be reviewed or mitigated because that are not helping you to achieve your goal.
Interested in the Marketing Canvas, you can find more information here.
Resources
Startup Failure Rate Statistics To Take In [2020] - https://hustlelife.net/startup-failure-rate-statistics/
Steve Blank - Startup Tools - https://steveblank.com/tools-and-blogs-for-entrepreneurs/
Infographic on the Marketing Canvas Process
The tool has been designed for facilitating the discussion when designing your strategy.
High-level process is:
- You start from an ambition/question (like increase revenue by 5%, have more digital transactions, be more meaningful, ...)
- You discuss using the 28 dimensions asking:
- What's blocking you to achieve your ambition? (brakes)
- What's helping you (Accelerator)?
- You can support this rating using any information, knowledge you have but it works also if you only rely on qualitative information.
- Then you map your answer on the Canvas. Red are brakes; Green are accelerators.
- Then you try to analyse these brakes/accelerators and understands what cause them, what are the correlation.
- Then you start ideating (brain-writing, co-create, ...), find crazy or impossible ideas) on what you could do (magic diamond, do things better, do different things).
- Then you prioritise your ideas.
- If you can you test it.
- Then you have your action plan.
Infographic Marketing Canvas
Marketing Strategy in Context
If you want to design the marketing strategy for your business, you should first start to analyse where you will play. What does it mean? It means that your product/service will be associated by consumers/buyers with other alternatives they have on the market (maybe no alternative exists which means that you creating a new category also referred as a blue ocean).
If you want to design the marketing strategy for your business, you should first start to analyse where you will play. What does it mean? It means that your product/service will be associated by consumers/buyers with other alternatives they have on the market (maybe no alternative exists which means that you creating a new category also referred as a blue ocean).
The Context of your Marketing strategy is the first element you analysed with the Marketing Canvas Method. It is composed by 3 distinctive elements: Category, Competitors and Trends (questions 1 & 3).
Marketing Canvas Method in 10 questions
The key questions you should ask yourself before you investigate what might be your scenarios for your strategy.
Identify the strategy where you would like to play. TESLA could have chosen the category where most of the electrical car offers where made. TESLA decided to enter the Segment F (Luxury saloon / full-size luxury sedan).
Key needs. What are the identified needs that customers/buyers are addressing when buying products/services in this category (pains/gains/functional needs).
Competitors. If not you, you else? It could be a competitor or a substitute. In the segment F, key competitors of TESLA are: BMW, Mercedes, Jaguar, Lexus, Audi, Porsche….
Rules of the category like average price, core features and add-ons, payment scheme/subscription model, buyer power. Price of a Porsche is around 100k€ which is the starting price point where TESLA positioned itself.
Category dynamic. What is the state of the category (few buyers/consumers or the market is saturated).
Marketing Strategy in Context
Examples:
Tesla has decided to enter the luxury segment where no real electrical car offer did exist (key needs were speed, design, social recognition).
Dove entered the cosmetic category where many alternatives existed
Apple entered the portable music device (with iPod) where the current offers where based on features and technologies but latent motives existed (social recognition, design and simplicity).
So before you investigate which options you should follow, you need first to answer these questions because it will set the scene. Then you can start investigating your scenarios using the Marketing Canvas Method.
How to get real insights for your Marketing Strategy?
Collection of videos talking about insights.
Richard Thorogood of Colgage-Palmolive describes how new technology is transforming market research, and how firms will need to adapt.
What has been the strategy for Airbnb to understand its customers and adapt to their needs? Chip Conley, Head of Hospitality at Airbnb, explains the process to achieve this
Using a real-world case study featuring one of the most iconic brands in clothing (Timberland), TEC Executive-in-Residence Kurian Tharakan shows how this clothing giant leveraged the motives, needs, wants and desires of their core customer.
Malcolm Gladwell gets inside the food industry's pursuit of the perfect spaghetti sauce -- and makes a larger argument about the nature of choice and happiness.
Insights in the Marketing Canvas