BLOG
A collection of article and ideas that help Smart Marketers to become Smarter
Marketing Canvas and Customers
When working on the Customers part of the Marketing Canvas, you are trying to identify relevant and actionable triggers (you can also call it insights) that you will try to leverage through the other dimensions of the canvas. We have 4 dimensions you can play with for identifying these triggers (JTBD, ASPIRATIONS, PAINS & GAINS, ENGAGEMENT).
In a nutshell
When working on the Customers part of the Marketing Canvas, you are trying to identify relevant and actionable triggers (you can also call it insights) that you will try to leverage through the other dimensions of the canvas. We have 4 dimensions you can play with for identifying these triggers (JTBD, ASPIRATIONS, PAINS & GAINS, ENGAGEMENT). What matters at the end of this exercise is that you avoid fluffy (triggers), you have built a list of triggers, you have qualified them (functional or emotional), you have identified supporting evidence and you have rated the strength of each trigger.
In the Marketing Canvas
In the Marketing Canvas, we have identified 6 main categories for building your Marketing Strategy: Customers, Brand, Value Proposition, Journey, Conversation and Metrics. Each of these categories have 4 dimensions which means that a total of 24 dimensions (6 by 4) are defining your Marketing Strategy.
Customers is one of the 4 dimensions of the Metrics category. That category is composed of 4 dimensions.
How to use it?
What I have noticed during workshops is that people have difficulties to identify strong insights that could be used for building value propositions that rocks. They usually list insights that are very broad (even fluffy) like customers want quality (who doesn’t?) but could not describe what sort of quality customers are looking for. One example that could help you understand my point is the following:
When designing mobile phones, we know that these phones should be robust but what does it really mean. Glass manufacturer designed glass that could resist a drop from 10 meters but customers were looking for a phone that could resist multiple drops from 1 meter because it is what they are experiencing in real life. You see robustness could be very different!
When working on the 4 dimensions of CUSTOMERS, you can identify a list of triggers that could be functional (What the customer is expecting to get?) and emotional (What the customer is expecting to feel?). An interesting read on benefits/triggers is the article from the beloved brand web site (here).
I have not found a global list with all potential triggers (functional and emotional) that you could choose when working on a specific case. The most elaborated list I have found so far is the one developed by Bain Consulting for B2C and B2B. They have identified elements of value (30 for B2C and 40 for B2B) classified as functional, emotional, life-changing, and social impact.
In the Marketing Canvas, I have only considered 2 categories (functional and emotional), therefore if you are using Bain B2C triggers, you should consider emotional, life-changing and social impact as Emotional triggers.
What I also like in the Bain proposal is their B2B mapping which is something you don’t easily find. In the case of the B2B mapping, you should consider Table Stakes and Functional Values as Functional and Ease of doing business value, Individual value and inspirational value as Emotional for the Marketing Canvas method.
More on Bain can be found here: B2C elements of value and B2B elements of value.
Some Videos
Potential ideas
How to add intangible values to product?
Immediacy - priority access, immediate delivery
Personalization - tailored just for you
Interpretation - support and guidance
Authenticity - how can you be sure it is the real thing?
Accessibility - wherever, whenever
Embodiment - books, live music
Patronage - "paying simply because it feels good",
Findability - "When there are millions of books, millions of songs, millions of films, millions of applications, millions of everything requesting our attention — and most of it free — being found is valuable."
source: Wikipedia Attention Economy
Method
What you should do is the following:
Take each dimension and identify triggers that are either functional or emotional;
List evidence supporting each trigger;
Rate each trigger from weak to strong in the function of the importance of the customer (the more the customer is demonstrating that s.he is effectively in needs of this trigger through past behavior (doing more than saying), the stronger the trigger).
Take the top 10 triggers at the end of this exercise and complete the template below.
Template
Marketing Canvas Method - Customer Triggers Template
Marketing Canvas - Positioning
Demystify brand positioning with the Marketing Canvas methodology. Understand its significance, different types, and evaluation process. Enhance your brand's market presence with effective positioning strategies.
About the Marketing Canvas Method
This article covers dimension 220 — Positioning, part of the
Brand meta-category. The Marketing Canvas Method structures
marketing strategy across 24 dimensions and 9 strategic archetypes.
Full framework reference at
marketingcanvas.net →
·
Get the book →
In a nutshell
Positioning is the mental real estate your brand owns in the customer's head. Not what you say about yourself — what customers say about you when you're not in the room. Dimension 220 in the Marketing Canvas Method measures whether your positioning is specific enough to exclude alternatives, validated by customer reality, and visible across every touchpoint. A positioning statement that could apply to three or more of your competitors unchanged is not a position. It's wallpaper.
What is Positioning?
Positioning answers one question: why should customers choose you over every alternative?
It must do three things at once: tell customers what category you're in, how you're different, and why they should care. And it must satisfy four criteria — it must be defined (written down and agreed), relevant (to the customer, not to your internal team), attainable (given your actual resources), and aligned with your culture (your people must be able to live it).
The most common failure isn't being wrong. It's being vague. "We provide innovative solutions for modern businesses" occupies no mental real estate because it describes everyone. "We're the indoor health protection company" occupies a specific space because it excludes everything else.
That's the discipline: positioning is as much about what you refuse to be as what you claim to be.
The Positioning Test
Two scoring rules tell you everything:
Score negative if your positioning statement could be copied, word for word, onto a competitor's website without anyone noticing. Vague positioning — "high quality," "customer-centric," "innovative" — signals the absence of strategic choice.
Score positive when your positioning is specific enough to exclude alternatives, confirmed by actual customer research (not internal assumption), and consistently visible from your website headline to your sales pitch to the way your team answers the phone.
The test is simple. Ask three people outside your company to read your positioning statement. Then ask: does this describe only us, or does it also describe our competitors? If the honest answer is "it also describes them" — you have work to do.
Positioning Types: Leader, Challenger, Disruptor
The Marketing Canvas recognises three strategic roles a brand can occupy in its competitive space. Your choice here is not just a marketing decision — it determines your entire competitive approach.
1. Leader Brand
The leader is the category default. When a customer thinks about your category, they think of you first. Leader brands enjoy substantial mindshare and market share, but they pay a price: as they grow toward mass-market adoption, they often lose the early enthusiasts who made them distinctive. Maintaining a leadership position requires constant investment in brand relevance, not just product breadth.
2. Challenger Brand
Challengers compete by turning the leader's strength into a weakness. The leader is everywhere? The challenger is exclusive. The leader is corporate? The challenger is human. The leader is expensive? The challenger is honest about value. Challenger positioning requires precision: you must know exactly which customer segment the leader is underserving, and you must own that segment completely before attempting to expand.
3. Game Changer / Disruptor Brand
Disruptors don't compete within the existing category — they redefine it. They find the job that incumbents have been ignoring, build a product or service architecture around it, and then name the new category. Green Clean did not compete as "another eco-friendly cleaning service." They redefined the job as indoor health protection — and in doing so, created a category where they were, by definition, the leader from day one.
The disruptor play is the highest-risk and highest-reward choice. It only works when the new category genuinely solves an unmet job — and when the brand has the resources to educate the market before competitors copy the framing.
Why Positioning is a Fatal Brake
In the Marketing Canvas Method, Positioning is classified as a Fatal Brake for three archetypes: A1 (Disruptive Newcomer), A5 (Pivot Pioneer), and A8 (Niche Expert).
A Fatal Brake is a dimension where a score below +2 actively blocks progress toward your Step 2 goal. You can fix everything else — and still fail — if this one dimension is broken.
Here is why it's fatal in each case:
A1 — Disruptive Newcomer: A disruptor with vague positioning is just another startup. Without a clear answer to "why choose you over the established player," you will exhaust your budget educating a market that then buys from the incumbent.
A5 — Pivot Pioneer: A pivot without repositioning is a rebrand without a direction. You can change your product entirely and still lose if the market's mental model of your brand hasn't shifted.
A8 — Niche Expert: A niche expert without precise positioning is a generalist pretending to specialize. Owning a niche requires staking a claim so specific that customers in that segment feel you were built exclusively for them.
If your current archetype is A1, A5, or A8 and your Positioning score is below +2 — address this before anything else.
Translating Positioning into Action
Positioning only exists if it's consistently expressed. A positioning statement that lives in a brand document but doesn't show up in the website headline, the sales deck, the onboarding email, and the customer support script isn't positioning. It's aspiration.
Four questions to pressure-test your execution:
Can every person in your team articulate your positioning in one sentence — without reading a card?
Does your website's above-the-fold message reflect your positioning directly?
Would a new customer arriving from any channel — social, search, referral — get the same positioning signal?
Does your pricing reinforce your positioning? (A premium positioning with discounting creates cognitive dissonance that erodes both.)
Consistent expression across every touchpoint is what turns a positioning statement into a customer perception. The perception is the only thing that matters.
Statements for Self-Assessment
Rate your agreement on a scale from −3 (completely disagree) to +3 (completely agree). There is no zero — the Marketing Canvas forces a directional position on every dimension.
Note on Detailed Track scoring: if averaging sub-question scores produces a mathematical zero, the method rounds to −1. A split score means the dimension is not clearly helping your goal — and "not clearly helping" requires the same investigation as "hurting."
Interpreting Your Scores
Negative scores (−3 to −1): Your positioning is unclear, generic, or misaligned. The brand occupies no distinct mental real estate. Customers have no reliable reason to choose you over alternatives — and no reliable way to describe you to others. This is the most expensive problem in marketing, because every other investment (media, content, acquisition) amplifies a message that doesn't stick.
Positive scores (+1 to +3): Your positioning is defined, specific, and consistently expressed. Customers can articulate your brand in terms that match how you'd describe it yourself. Your positioning excludes alternatives rather than trying to appeal to everyone — which means the customers who choose you are choosing you deliberately.
Case Study: Green Clean's Positioning Journey
Green Clean is an eco-friendly residential cleaning service. Here is what the same company looks like at three different positioning maturity levels.
Weak positioning (scores −3 to −1): Green Clean describes itself as "an eco-friendly cleaning solution prioritizing sustainability." The problem: so does every competitor in the eco-cleaning segment. There is no functional category, no excluded alternative, no reason to choose Green Clean over EcoPure or NatureFresh. Customers see the brand as generic. The positioning is real estate no one can find.
Transitional positioning (scores +1 to +2): Green Clean has sharpened to "safe and sustainable cleaning solutions." Better — but still vague. "Safe" and "sustainable" are table stakes in the eco-cleaning category. The positioning describes the category, not the brand's unique place within it. Customers understand what Green Clean does but still can't explain why they'd choose it over a premium competitor.
Strong positioning (score +3): Green Clean shifts to "the indoor health protection company." This is a different category altogether — not eco-cleaning, not green products, but health protection in the home. It references a specific job (protect my family's indoor environment from toxins), excludes conventional cleaning companies that cannot credibly make this claim, and supports a premium price point ($200/visit vs. $100 for conventional alternatives). Every touchpoint — the Family Health Report dashboard, the B-Corp certification, the non-toxic proprietary formula — now serves as proof of the positioning rather than decoration around it.
The shift from "eco-friendly cleaning" to "indoor health protection" is the model. The words changed by a sentence. The strategic outcome changed by a category.
Connected Dimensions
Positioning does not operate in isolation. Four other dimensions must align with it:
110 — JTBD: Positioning must reference the customer's actual job. If your positioning doesn't connect to what customers are hiring you to do, it will feel hollow — however well-crafted.
210 — Purpose: Positioning operationalises purpose for the market. Purpose is the internal compass; positioning is the external expression. They must be consistent.
240 — Visual Identity: Visual identity makes positioning visible. A premium positioning with budget-looking design creates dissonance. A disruptor positioning with corporate aesthetics kills the claim before the first word is read.
310 — Features: Features must deliver what positioning promises. If your positioning claims "indoor health protection," every feature in the product must serve that job. Features that don't are complexity without strategic value.
Conclusion
Positioning is the dimension that makes all other marketing work. Without it, media spend amplifies noise. Without it, content has nothing to anchor to. Without it, the sales conversation starts from zero every time.
You should be able to state your positioning in one sentence, test it against your competitors, and find it expressed consistently across every customer touchpoint. If you can't — that is where to start.
The scoring logic is unambiguous: if your positioning statement could describe three of your competitors as easily as it describes you, it is not a position. It is a description of the category. The category doesn't need a marketing strategy. Your brand does.
Sources
Al Ries & Jack Trout, Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind, McGraw-Hill, 1981 (revised 2001) — the foundational text on owning a position in the customer's mind
April Dunford, Obviously Awesome: How to Nail Product Positioning, Page Two Books, 2019 — aprildunford.com— the modern practitioner standard on positioning methodology
Fabrik Brands, "Brand Positioning Trends 2025", November 2025 — fabrikbrands.com
Crealytics, "Brand Marketing in 2025: 8 Power Moves Every Marketer Must Master", 2025 — crealytics.com
Marketing Canvas Method, Appendix E: The 24 Dimensions — Dimension 220 Positioning, Laurent Bouty, 2026
Le Marché dans le Marketing Canvas
Dans l’enthousiasme de travailler sur sa stratégie marketing, on se précipite souvent et oublie l’importance de ce que je considère comme la première étape: la compréhension du marché dans lequel nous allons opérer (startup) ou nous opérons déjà (entreprise existante). Il y a 3 questions importantes à se poser lorsqu’on analyse le marché. C’est questions sont: …
Dans l’enthousiasme de travailler sur sa stratégie marketing, on se précipite souvent et oublie l’importance de ce que je considère comme la première étape: la compréhension du marché dans lequel nous allons opérer (startup) ou nous opérons déjà (entreprise existante).
Les questions qu’il faut se poser sont les suivantes:
Comment définir le marché?
Comment mesurer le marché?
Comment qualifier le marché?
Comment définir le marché?
Bien que la question puisse paraître simple et évidente, elle ne l’est pas.
Petit exemple: dans quel marché TESLA a-t-il décidé de se lancer avec son modèle S? La majorité des voitures électriques avant TESLA se situait dans un marché d’acheteurs urbains avec des petits déplacements. TESLA a privilégié le marché du luxe et plus particulièrement le marché des voitures sportives luxueuses dont la référence est … Porsche. En choisissant le marché, certaines constantes sont fixées telles que: le prix moyen (100k€ pour une voiture de sport de luxe) ou certaines caractéristiques clés du marché (performance, design, vitesse, …).
Comme illustré dans mon exemple, le marché conditionne certaines hypothèses de départ. On peut bien sur être un game changer et redéfinir ces règles toutefois elles restent pour l’acheteur un cadre de référence qu’il va utilisé pour comparer votre produit (lorsque vous louez une chambre chez AirbnB, vous comparez votre achat à une location dans un hotel, un gite ou un bed & breakfast).
Bien qu’il existe de nombreuses définitions d’un marché, celle que je préfère vient de Bill Aulet [1]. Il définit le marché en 3 règles:
Les clients dans le marché achètent tous des produits similaires.
Les clients dans le marché ont le même cycle d’achat et s’attendent à ce que les produits fournissent de la valeur d’une façon similaire.
Il y a du bouche à oreille entre les clients d’un même marché.
La première question est donc: Dans quel marché comptez-vous opérer?
Comment mesurer le marché?
Après avoir défini le marché dans le lequel vous allez opérer, il faut essayer de le mesurer afin de définir son potentiel et votre ambition. Une méthode provenant encore de l’entrepreneuriat s’appelle le TAM (pour Total Available Market), SAM (pour Serviceable Available Market) et SOM (Serviceable Obtainable Market) .
Derrière ces acronymes, ce cache des concepts assez simples:
Le TAM correspond au marché total possible. Si on prend l’exemple de Airbnb cela correspondrait à toutes les locations de chambres dans le monde pour une année.
le SAM correspond à la partie du marché où vous êtes actif (ou allez être actif si vous lancer votre activité). Le passage du TAM au SAM dépend de vos critères: géographique (là où vous êtes actifs), type de produit (ioS ou Android, premium ou cost), ...
le SOM est votre objectif en part de marché. Combien de % du SAM voulez vous obtenir?
la seconde question est donc: quelle est la taille du marché ?
Comment qualifier le marché?
Finalement, il vous reste à qualifier le marché. Qu’est ce que cela veut dire? Le marché a une vie et est dynamique comme un organisme vivant (il apparaît, grandit, se stabilise puis décline). Si vous ne comprenez pas l’etat du marché SAM dans lequel vous entrez, vous risquez de mal définir votre stratégie commerciale (le volume des ventes diffère entre chaque état).
Source: Wikipedia
La description ci-dessous provient de Wikipedia (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cycle_de_vie_(commerce))
Stade de lancement: Introduction du produit sur le marché
coûts élevés de production et de développement
faible volume de vente
pertes pour l'entreprise
prix élevés
Stade de croissance
coûts réduits par les économies d'échelles
croissance importante des volumes de vente
profits croissants pour l'entreprise et marges élevées
prix assurant une large part de marché
début de simplification du marché: les grandes entreprises achètent les PME innovantes
Stade de maturité
marges réduites, disparition des compétiteurs incapables d'économies d'échelle (absorption, retrait, faillite, oligopoles, stabilisation des parts de marché)coûts de production faibles, mais coûts de promotion commerciale et de services à la clientèle élevés
maximum des volumes de vente
forte sensibilité à la conjoncture
profits encore très importants mais stagnants
fortes segmentations : les gammes de produits se sont diversifiées pour répondre à une demande exigeante
tendance à la baisse des prix en raison de la concurrence
anticipation de produits de remplacement par la recherche et le développement
Stade de déclin
diminution des ventes
diminution des profits
diminution des prix
apparition de produits de remplacement
La dernière question est: quel est l’état du marché ?
Conclusion
En répondant à ces 3 questions clairement, vous aurez plus facile lorsque vous définirez votre stratégie commerciale. L’étape suivante dans l’exercice du Marketing Canvas est de définir la compétition.
Référence
Bill Aulet, Disciplined Entrepreneurship : 24 Steps to a Successful Startup, John Wiley & Sons (30 août 2013)
Cycle de vie, Wikipedia